openDemocracyUK

Number 10 must lift briefing ban on openDemocracy, says European press freedom watchdog

Government accused of attempting to “isolate and punish critical coverage” by boycotting media outlets.

Adam Bychawski
29 May 2020
Boris Johnson chairing a COVID-19 press briefing this week. Media outlets including openDemocracy, The Sunday Times and Channel 4 have been banned from asking him questions.
|
PA Images

Several prominent international organisations monitoring press freedom have written to the Prime Minister Boris Johnson asking him to overturn the ban on openDemocracy and other media outlets from press briefings.

Earlier this week, the government was condemned for using “tactics deployed by repressive regimes” after openDemocracy revealed it was barred from asking direct questions at Number 10’s televised daily briefing on the orders of Johnson and his senior advisor Dominic Cummings.

The letter from the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), which is signed by organisations including European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF), Article 19 and the European Federation of Journalists, criticises the government for its attempts to “restrict media scrutiny of its policies and discredit critical reporting”. 

Over the weekend, the government sought to dismiss reports about Cummings flouting lockdown rules by saying that they came from “campaigning newspapers”. The same language was used to justify openDemocracy’s exclusion from Number 10’s COVID-19 press briefings.

The letter accuses the government of attempting to “isolate and punish critical coverage”. In recent months, Number 10 has refused to put forward ministers or representatives to be interviewed on a host of news programmes including BBC Radio 4’s Today Show and ITV’s Good Morning Britain.

In February, Lee Cain, the prime minister’s head of communication, told reporters that “we are welcome to brief whoever we like, whenever we like” after Number 10 was criticised for inviting only selected journalists to a press briefing.

After the Sunday Times published a report last month revealing that the prime minister missed five Cobra meetings on the coronavirus in the lead up to the outbreak, the paper was reportedly banned from asking questions at Number 10’s daily press briefing.    

The ECPMF warns that the government's refusal to engage with media outlets amid the pandemic could risk a “public information crisis” by preventing the press from informing the public.

The intervention from the leading European press freedom watchdog comes after a raft of national and international organisations criticised the government for its treatment of journalists on Wednesday.

Reporters Without Borders warned that Downing Street’s “vindictive” response to media criticism of its handling of the pandemic meant press freedom in the UK was being eroded.

While English PEN, a branch of the international association of writers, said Boris Johnson’s government was intentionally discrediting openDemocracy and other news outlets.

And International Media Support (IMS), headquartered in Denmark, told openDemocracy that “worse was to come unless these early warnings about the erosion of press freedom in the UK are confronted and reversed”.

This week, the Society of Editors, whose 400 members campaign for the right to freedom of expression in the UK news media, wrote to the prime minister to raise concerns about the language used to dismiss damaging news stories about Cummings.

Ian Murray, the society’s executive director, said he asked for reassurances that the deployment of the phrase “campaigning” to describe media outlets is not part of a wider campaign.     

On Wednesday, BBC Newsnight host Emily Maitlis chose not to appear on the programme after her monologue criticising the government’s defence of Cummings prompted fury among some Conservative MPs. 

In her opening remarks on Tuesday’s show, Maitlis said Cummings had “broken the rules” and “the country can see that, and it’s shocked the Government cannot”.

Following the broadcast, the BBC issued a statement saying that the presenter’s comments breached impartiality rules. 

However, the judgement came under fire from several journalists and politicians. 

Keith Brown, SNP deputy leader, said the statement was a “gutless capitulation”. While the National Union of Journalists’s general secretary Michelle Stanistreet said that journalists “should certainly not be castigated” for holding the government to account.

Trade deals, Brexit and disaster capitalism

If you're tired of Brexit, you ain't seen nothing yet.

Is the UK joining Trumpland? Does this explain Boris Johnson's kamikaze EU negotiating strategy? And could beating this deal begin a challenge to the iniquities of the global economy?

Join us for a free live discussion at 5pm UK time, 24 September

In conversation:

Nick Dearden Director of Global Justice Now and author of 'Trade Secrets: The Truth about the US Trade Deal and How We Can Stop It'

Caroline Molloy Editor of openDemocracyUK and ourNHS

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData